Final Critique

Discussion from final review:

- Project was effective at addressing the design approaches that were established in the first two - projects, worked thoroughly on resolving them into one hybrid.
- Potential in the mass system, shouldn't have gotten rid of it entirely with turning it into a planar system, some parts could have remained massive.
- Carving action of voids seen in midterm model almost lost in new planar system, reads more as angled planes and not carving.
- Frame system depended heavily on the planes, acted only as bordering of openings and not on its own.
- Develop design approaches to be more than just additive and subtraction.
-Two occupants were established, but left underdeveloped, possibilities for defining further actions and inhabitation of space rather than just existing in a room.
- Access to the site needs to be further established, good physical connection but needs more circulation routes if it is to really effect the flow in and out of structure.
- Did not address influence of body diagram from film very effectively, could make occupants more connected to actions.